On 10/16/2018 6:36 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018, Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chau...@intel.com> wrote:
On 10/15/2018 7:57 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
Will be needed in the future. No functional changes.
Agree, will be needing this while setting up DSI protocol timeouts for ICL.

Cc: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chau...@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c     | 13 +++++++++++++
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h     |  1 +
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_vbt.c | 16 +---------------
   3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
index 4daa1da94047..a32cc1f4b384 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
@@ -15,3 +15,16 @@ int intel_dsi_bitrate(const struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi)
return intel_dsi->pclk * bpp / intel_dsi->lane_count;
   }
+
+int intel_dsi_tlpx_ns(const struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi)
+{
+       switch (intel_dsi->escape_clk_div) {
+       default:
+       case 0:
+               return 50;
+       case 1:
+               return 100;
+       case 2:
+               return 200;
+       }
+}
Can we change the return of this function to unsigned int, there is no way
that this function can return < 0  as per current implementation??
I'd rather not. I'm sure I should be able to justify this exhaustively
with examples, but I think gratuitous use of unsigned types leads to
issues with integer promotions and signed/unsigned comparisons etc. So
if it's "just a number", used for arithmetics, I'll pretty much choose
int every time.

And because you can silently assign negative numbers to unsigned types,
it's not a good safeguard to ensure positive numbers. Unless you're
happy with large positive numbers...

Unsigned types are best for register contents, bits, masks, etc.

Agree with issues mentioned, i thought that should be case to case :),
but fine with uniform approach.
Reviewed-by: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chau...@intel.com>

Regards,
Madhav



BR,
Jani.


Regards,
Madhav

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
index 68f14d8f1e18..0d911a4adfaa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.h
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ static inline struct intel_dsi *enc_to_intel_dsi(struct 
drm_encoder *encoder)
/* intel_dsi.c */
   int intel_dsi_bitrate(const struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi);
+int intel_dsi_tlpx_ns(const struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi);
/* vlv_dsi.c */
   void vlv_dsi_wait_for_fifo_empty(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, enum port 
port);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_vbt.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_vbt.c
index fdeba8386d53..b0d8548f0462 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_vbt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_vbt.c
@@ -512,21 +512,7 @@ static void vlv_dphy_param_init(struct intel_dsi 
*intel_dsi)
        u32 lp_to_hs_switch, hs_to_lp_switch;
        u32 mul;
- switch (intel_dsi->escape_clk_div) {
-       case 0:
-               tlpx_ns = 50;
-               break;
-       case 1:
-               tlpx_ns = 100;
-               break;
-
-       case 2:
-               tlpx_ns = 200;
-               break;
-       default:
-               tlpx_ns = 50;
-               break;
-       }
+       tlpx_ns = intel_dsi_tlpx_ns(intel_dsi);
switch (intel_dsi->lane_count) {
        case 1:

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to