On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 12:23:32PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 07:03:52PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 03:57:16PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > > This patch fixes the original commit c0cfb10d9e1de49 ("drm/i915/edp:
> > > Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP") that causes
> > > a blank screen in case of certain eDP panels (Eg: seen on Dell XPS13 9350)
> > > where first link training fails and a retraining is required by falling
> > > back to lower link rate/lane count.
> > > In case of some panels they advertise higher link rate/lane count
> > > than whats required for supporting the panel's native mode.
> > > But we always link train at highest link rate/lane count for eDP
> > > and if that fails we can still fallback to lower link rate/lane count
> > > as long as the fallback link BW still fits the native mode to avoid
> > > pruning the panel's native mode yet retraining at fallback values
> > > to recover from a blank screen.
> > > 
> > > v2:
> > > * Send uevent if link failure on eDP unconditionally
> > > 
> > > Cc: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.tay...@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> > > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
> > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107489
> > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105338
> > > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com>
> > > Tested-by: Alexander Wilson <alexander.wil...@ncf.edu>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c               | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 26 ++++++-----------
> > >  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c 
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > index 436c22de33b6..e4de5257cd87 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -557,6 +557,21 @@ static bool intel_dp_link_params_valid(struct 
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp, int link_rate,
> > >   return true;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static bool intel_dp_can_link_train_fallback_for_edp(struct intel_dp 
> > > *intel_dp,
> > > +                                              int link_rate,
> > > +                                              uint8_t lane_count)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_display_mode *fixed_mode = 
> > > intel_dp->attached_connector->panel.fixed_mode;
> > 
> > const
> >
> 
> Will add const to the fixed_mode.
>  
> > > + int mode_rate, max_rate;
> > > +
> > > + mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(fixed_mode->clock, 18);
> > > + max_rate = intel_dp_max_data_rate(link_rate, lane_count);
> > > + if (mode_rate > max_rate)
> > > +         return false;
> > 
> > I wonder if we should extract this into a helper and share with
> > mode_valid(). Then again, it's just a few lines so maybe not worth it.
> > 
> > > +
> > > + return true;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > >                                       int link_rate, uint8_t lane_count)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -566,9 +581,23 @@ int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct 
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > >                               intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> > >                               link_rate);
> > >   if (index > 0) {
> > > +         if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
> > > +             !intel_dp_can_link_train_fallback_for_edp(intel_dp,
> > > +                                                       
> > > intel_dp->common_rates[index - 1],
> > > +                                                       lane_count)) {
> > > +                 DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Retrying Link training for eDP with same 
> > > parameters\n");
> > > +                 return 0;
> > > +         }
> > >           intel_dp->max_link_rate = intel_dp->common_rates[index - 1];
> > >           intel_dp->max_link_lane_count = lane_count;
> > >   } else if (lane_count > 1) {
> > > +         if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) &&
> > > +             !intel_dp_can_link_train_fallback_for_edp(intel_dp,
> > > +                                                       
> > > intel_dp_max_common_rate(intel_dp),
> > > +                                                       lane_count >> 1)) 
> > > {
> > > +                 DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Retrying Link training for eDP with same 
> > > parameters\n");
> > > +                 return 0;
> > > +         }
> > >           intel_dp->max_link_rate = intel_dp_max_common_rate(intel_dp);
> > >           intel_dp->max_link_lane_count = lane_count >> 1;
> > 
> > This whole thing is getting a bit messy. I think it would worthwile to
> > rewrite this as something like:
> > 
> > intel_dp_update_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp)
> > {
> >     int link_rate = intel_dp->link_rate;
> >     int lane_count = intel_dp->lane_count;
> > 
> >     if (intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp, &link_rate, 
> > &lane_count))
> >             return -1;
> > 
> >     if (is_edp() && !edp_can_link_train_thing(link_rate, lane_count)) {
> >             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("...");
> >             return 0;
> >     }
> > 
> >     intel_dp->max_link_rate = link_rate;
> >     intel_dp->max_link_lane_count = lane_count;
> > 
> >     return 0;
> > }
> > 
> > But that can be done later. With the missing const added this patch is
> > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> >
> 
> Yes this can be refactored/reorganized as a follow up patch, also when 
> downclock mode
> checks get in.
> So until then thsi fix is good to be merged right?

Yes.

> 
> Manasi
>  
> > >   } else {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c 
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > > index a9f40985a621..30be0e39bd5f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> > > @@ -367,22 +367,14 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > >   return;
> > >  
> > >   failure_handling:
> > > - /* Dont fallback and prune modes if its eDP */
> > > - if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> > > -         DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link 
> > > rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> > > -                       intel_connector->base.base.id,
> > > -                       intel_connector->base.name,
> > > -                       intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> > > -         if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
> > > -                                                      
> > > intel_dp->link_rate,
> > > -                                                      
> > > intel_dp->lane_count))
> > > -                 /* Schedule a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start 
> > > modeset */
> > > -                 schedule_work(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work);
> > > - } else {
> > > -         DRM_ERROR("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate 
> > > = %d, lane count = %d",
> > > -                   intel_connector->base.base.id,
> > > -                   intel_connector->base.name,
> > > -                   intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> > > - }
> > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = 
> > > %d, lane count = %d",
> > > +               intel_connector->base.base.id,
> > > +               intel_connector->base.name,
> > > +               intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> > > + if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
> > > +                                              intel_dp->link_rate,
> > > +                                              intel_dp->lane_count))
> > > +         /* Schedule a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
> > > +         schedule_work(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work);
> > >   return;
> > >  }
> > > -- 
> > > 2.18.0
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to