On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 10:23 -0700, Azhar Shaikh wrote: > Log the PSR mode/revision (PSR1 or PSR2) in the debugfs file > i915_edp_psr_status. > Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Azhar Shaikh <azhar.sha...@intel.com> > --- > Changes in v4: > - Fix the rebase error in v3 of adding typecast to bool > - in i915_edp_psr_status(), which is not needed > > Changes in v3: > - rebased > > Changes in v2: > - Fix checkpatch warning. > - Add Reviewed-by: from v1 > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > index 26b7e5276b15..544ec5cdfe9f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > @@ -2708,6 +2708,8 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file > *m, void *data) > intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); > > mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock); > + seq_printf(m, "PSR mode: %s\n", > + dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled ? "PSR2" : "PSR1"); > seq_printf(m, "Enabled: %s\n", yesno(dev_priv- > >psr.enabled)); > seq_printf(m, "Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x%03x\n", > dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits); _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
