Hi,
On 8/17/2018 11:13 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 07:44:06PM +0530, Mahesh Kumar wrote:
This patch adds support to decode system memory bandwidth and other
parameters for broxton platform, which will be used for arbitrated
display memory bandwidth calculation in GEN9 based platforms and
WM latency level-0 Work-around calculation on GEN9+ platforms.
Changes since V1:
- s/memdev_info/dram_info
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.ku...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 11 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 30 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 157 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 18a45e7a3d7c..16629601c9f4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -1070,6 +1070,116 @@ static void intel_sanitize_options(struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
intel_gvt_sanitize_options(dev_priv);
}
+static int
+bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ struct dram_info *dram_info = &dev_priv->dram_info;
+ u32 dram_channels;
+ u32 mem_freq_khz, val;
+ u8 num_active_channels;
+ int i;
+
+ val = I915_READ(BXT_P_CR_MC_BIOS_REQ_0_0_0);
+ mem_freq_khz = DIV_ROUND_UP((val & BXT_REQ_DATA_MASK) *
+ BXT_MEMORY_FREQ_MULTIPLIER_HZ, 1000);
+
+ dram_channels = (val >> BXT_DRAM_CHANNEL_ACTIVE_SHIFT) &
+ BXT_DRAM_CHANNEL_ACTIVE_MASK;
+ num_active_channels = hweight32(dram_channels);
+
+ /* Each active bit represents 4-byte channel */
+ dram_info->bandwidth_kbps = (mem_freq_khz * num_active_channels * 4);
+
+ if (dram_info->bandwidth_kbps == 0) {
+ DRM_INFO("Couldn't get system memory bandwidth\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Now read each DUNIT8/9/10/11 to check the rank of each dimms.
+ */
+ for (i = BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT_START; i <= BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT_END; i++) {
+ u8 rank, size, width;
+ enum dram_rank ch_rank;
+
+ val = I915_READ(BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT(i));
+ if (val == 0xFFFFFFFF)
+ continue;
+
+ dram_info->num_channels++;
+ rank = val & BXT_DRAM_RANK_MASK;
+ width = (val >> BXT_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT) & BXT_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK;
+ size = (val >> BXT_DRAM_SIZE_SHIFT) & BXT_DRAM_SIZE_MASK;
+ if (rank == BXT_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
+ ch_rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
+ else if (rank == BXT_DRAM_RANK_DUAL)
+ ch_rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL;
+ else
+ ch_rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
+
+ if (size == BXT_DRAM_SIZE_4GB)
+ size = 4;
+ else if (size == BXT_DRAM_SIZE_6GB)
+ size = 6;
+ else if (size == BXT_DRAM_SIZE_8GB)
+ size = 8;
+ else if (size == BXT_DRAM_SIZE_12GB)
+ size = 12;
+ else if (size == BXT_DRAM_SIZE_16GB)
+ size = 16;
+ else
+ size = 0;
+
+ width = (1 << width) * 8;
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("dram size:%dGB width:X%d rank:%s\n", size,
+ width, rank == BXT_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE ? "single" :
+ rank == BXT_DRAM_RANK_DUAL ? "dual" : "unknown");
+
+ /*
+ * If any of the channel is single rank channel,
+ * worst case output will be same as if single rank
+ * memory, so consider single rank memory.
+ */
+ if (dram_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID)
+ dram_info->rank = ch_rank;
+ else if (ch_rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
+ dram_info->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
+ }
+
+ if (dram_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID) {
+ DRM_INFO("couldn't get memory rank information\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ dram_info->valid = true;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void
+intel_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ struct dram_info *dram_info = &dev_priv->dram_info;
+ int ret;
+
+ dram_info->valid = false;
+ dram_info->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
+ dram_info->bandwidth_kbps = 0;
+ dram_info->num_channels = 0;
+
+ if (!IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
+ return;
+
+ ret = bxt_get_dram_info(dev_priv);
+ if (ret)
+ return;
+
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM bandwidth:%d KBps, total-channels: %u\n",
+ dram_info->bandwidth_kbps, dram_info->num_channels);
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM rank: %s rank\n",
+ (dram_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL) ?
+ "dual" : "single");
+}
+
/**
* i915_driver_init_hw - setup state requiring device access
* @dev_priv: device private
@@ -1187,6 +1297,12 @@ static int i915_driver_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv)
goto err_msi;
intel_opregion_setup(dev_priv);
+ /*
+ * Fill the dram structure to get the system raw bandwidth and
+ * dram info. This will be used for memory latency calculation.
+ */
+ intel_get_dram_info(dev_priv);
+
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 0f49f9988dfa..46f942fa7d60 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1904,6 +1904,17 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
bool distrust_bios_wm;
} wm;
+ struct dram_info {
+ bool valid;
+ u8 num_channels;
+ enum dram_rank {
+ I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID = 0,
+ I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE,
+ I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL
+ } rank;
+ u32 bandwidth_kbps;
+ } dram_info;
+
struct i915_runtime_pm runtime_pm;
struct {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 5530c470f30d..66900d027570 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -9634,6 +9634,36 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
#define DC_STATE_DEBUG_MASK_CORES (1 << 0)
#define DC_STATE_DEBUG_MASK_MEMORY_UP (1 << 1)
+#define BXT_P_CR_MC_BIOS_REQ_0_0_0 _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x7114)
+#define BXT_REQ_DATA_MASK 0x3F
+#define BXT_DRAM_CHANNEL_ACTIVE_SHIFT 12
+#define BXT_DRAM_CHANNEL_ACTIVE_MASK 0xF
Thanks a lot for the spec pointers. But now that I opened it and
started to reading here it was hard to review and I noticed this
is because the way that it is defined here doesn't respect our
standards as documented:
"
* For bit fields, define a ``_MASK`` and a ``_SHIFT`` macro. Define bit field
* contents so that they are already shifted in place, and can be directly
* OR'd.
"
So I'll modify all "_MASK" defines to make them shifted in place, Should
I redefine all the bit definitions also to be shifted?
BTW these bit-fields are readonly for driver,
-Mahesh
So please provide a new version that follows the rules and
that it is easier to review. And sorry for not noticing this
on yesterday's review.
+#define BXT_MEMORY_FREQ_MULTIPLIER_HZ 133333333
+
+#define BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT8 0x1000
+#define BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT9 0x1200
+#define BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT_START 8
+#define BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT_END 11
+#define BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT(x) _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + \
+ _PICK_EVEN((x) - 8, BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT8,\
+ BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT9))
+#define BXT_DRAM_RANK_MASK 0x3
+#define BXT_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE 0x1
+#define BXT_DRAM_RANK_DUAL 0x3
+#define BXT_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK 0x3
+#define BXT_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT 4
+#define BXT_DRAM_WIDTH_X8 0x0
+#define BXT_DRAM_WIDTH_X16 0x1
+#define BXT_DRAM_WIDTH_X32 0x2
+#define BXT_DRAM_WIDTH_X64 0x3
+#define BXT_DRAM_SIZE_MASK 0x7
+#define BXT_DRAM_SIZE_SHIFT 6
+#define BXT_DRAM_SIZE_4GB 0x0
+#define BXT_DRAM_SIZE_6GB 0x1
+#define BXT_DRAM_SIZE_8GB 0x2
+#define BXT_DRAM_SIZE_12GB 0x3
+#define BXT_DRAM_SIZE_16GB 0x4
+
/* Please see hsw_read_dcomp() and hsw_write_dcomp() before using this
register,
* since on HSW we can't write to it using I915_WRITE. */
#define D_COMP_HSW _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5F0C)
--
2.16.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
