On 08/08/2018 12:31, Chris Wilson wrote:
We can keep the original batch around and avoid recreating it between
reset iterations to focus on the impact of resets.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com>
---
tests/gem_eio.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/gem_eio.c b/tests/gem_eio.c
index de161332d..5250a414c 100644
--- a/tests/gem_eio.c
+++ b/tests/gem_eio.c
@@ -650,35 +650,38 @@ static void reset_stress(int fd,
uint32_t ctx0, unsigned int engine,
unsigned int flags)
{
+ const uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
+ struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {
+ .handle = gem_create(fd, 4096)
+ };
+ struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf = {
+ .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj),
+ .buffer_count = 1,
+ .flags = engine,
+ };
+ gem_write(fd, obj.handle, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe));
+
igt_until_timeout(5) {
- struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf = { };
- struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = { };
- uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
+ uint32_t ctx = context_create_safe(fd);
There is still this per loop...
igt_spin_t *hang;
unsigned int i;
- uint32_t ctx;
gem_quiescent_gpu(fd);
igt_require(i915_reset_control(flags & TEST_WEDGE ?
false : true));
- ctx = context_create_safe(fd);
-
/*
* Start executing a spin batch with some queued batches
* against a different context after it.
*/
hang = spin_sync(fd, ctx0, engine);
... and a ton of operations in this one, so I wonder why bother with one
batch?
- obj.handle = gem_create(fd, 4096);
- gem_write(fd, obj.handle, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe));
+ execbuf.rsvd1 = ctx;
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+ gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf);
- execbuf.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj);
- execbuf.buffer_count = 1;
execbuf.rsvd1 = ctx0;
- execbuf.flags = engine;
-
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf);
@@ -706,8 +709,9 @@ static void reset_stress(int fd,
gem_sync(fd, obj.handle);
igt_spin_batch_free(fd, hang);
gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx);
- gem_close(fd, obj.handle);
}
+
+ gem_close(fd, obj.handle);
}
/*
But anyway - no technical complaints:
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
