On 15/06/18 11:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
As we hang ctx0 quite frequently, it needs to be harden against being
banned.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>

For some reason I thought we had more hang stress tests.

Reviewed-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenzi...@intel.com>

---
  tests/gem_eio.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/gem_eio.c b/tests/gem_eio.c
index e1aff639d..5faf7502b 100644
--- a/tests/gem_eio.c
+++ b/tests/gem_eio.c
@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ static void test_inflight_internal(int fd, unsigned int 
wait)
   */
  static void test_reset_stress(int fd, unsigned int flags)
  {
-       uint32_t ctx0 = gem_context_create(fd);
+       uint32_t ctx0 = context_create_safe(fd);

I guess until (before Mika's patch) now we were covered by 'ctx'
being created and destroyed all the time.

Thanks,
Antonio

igt_until_timeout(5) {
                struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf = { };

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to