We don't properly test the i915.disable_display=1 module parameter. We
have one display info with .num_pipes = 0, but AFAIK there are others
than ivb q. Let's see what CI says of this for platforms with
display. *evil grin*.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
index aebe0469ddaa..5024461fe965 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ struct drm_printer;
param(bool, load_detect_test, false) \
param(bool, force_reset_modeset_test, false) \
param(bool, error_capture, true) \
- param(bool, disable_display, false) \
+ param(bool, disable_display, true) \
param(bool, verbose_state_checks, true) \
param(bool, nuclear_pageflip, false) \
param(bool, enable_dp_mst, true) \
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
