Quoting Matthew Auld (2018-06-05 19:10:34)
> On 5 June 2018 at 17:06, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > The inactive counter was over the active list, and vice versa.
> > Fortuitously this should not cause a problem in practice as they shared
> > the same array and clamped the number of entries they would write.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.a...@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.a...@gmail.com>

Queued up, thanks for the review.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to