On Fri, 11 May 2018, Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 12:51 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
>> By moving the check from psr_compute_config() to psr_init_dpcd(), we
>> get
>> to set the dev_priv->psr.sink_support flag only when the panel is
>> capable of changing power state. An additional benefit is that the
>> check
>> will be performed only at init time instead of every atomic_check.
>> 
>> This should change the psr_basic IGT failures on HSW to skips.
>> 
>> v2: Return early when SET_POWER_CAPABLE bit is 0 (Jose)
>> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106217
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106346

Pushed to dinq, thanks for the patch and review.

BR,
Jani.

>> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  |  8 ++++++--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 11 +++++------
>>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index dde92e4af5d3..cfd95eaa0d0d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -3762,8 +3762,6 @@ intel_edp_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>              dev_priv->no_aux_handshake = intel_dp-
>> >dpcd[DP_MAX_DOWNSPREAD] &
>>                      DP_NO_AUX_HANDSHAKE_LINK_TRAINING;
>>  
>> -    intel_psr_init_dpcd(intel_dp);
>> -
>>      /*
>>       * Read the eDP display control registers.
>>       *
>> @@ -3779,6 +3777,12 @@ intel_edp_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>              DRM_DEBUG_KMS("eDP DPCD: %*ph\n", (int)
>> sizeof(intel_dp->edp_dpcd),
>>                            intel_dp->edp_dpcd);
>>  
>> +    /*
>> +     * This has to be called after intel_dp->edp_dpcd is filled,
>> PSR checks
>> +     * for SET_POWER_CAPABLE bit in intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1]
>> +     */
>> +    intel_psr_init_dpcd(intel_dp);
>> +
>>      /* Read the eDP 1.4+ supported link rates. */
>>      if (intel_dp->edp_dpcd[0] >= DP_EDP_14) {
>>              __le16 sink_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
>> index 8fe6d2f9ab2b..61ade81576f5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
>> @@ -252,9 +252,13 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp
>> *intel_dp)
>>  
>>      if (!intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0])
>>              return;
>> -
>>      DRM_DEBUG_KMS("eDP panel supports PSR version %x\n",
>>                    intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0]);
>> +
>> +    if (!(intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_SET_POWER_CAP)) {
>> +            DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Panel lacks power state control, PSR
>> cannot be enabled\n");
>> +            return;
>> +    }
>>      dev_priv->psr.sink_support = true;
>>  
>>      if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 &&
>> @@ -642,11 +646,6 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp
>> *intel_dp,
>>              return;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    if (!(intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_SET_POWER_CAP)) {
>> -            DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: panel lacks
>> power state control\n");
>> -            return;
>> -    }
>> -
>>      crtc_state->has_psr = true;
>>      crtc_state->has_psr2 = intel_psr2_config_valid(intel_dp,
>> crtc_state);
>>      DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling PSR%s\n", crtc_state->has_psr2 ? "2"
>> : "");
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to