On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 17:54 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> Entry corresponding to 220 us setup time was missing. I am not aware
> of
> any specific bug this fixes, but this could potentially result in
> enabling
> PSR on a panel with a higher setup time requirement than supported by
> the
> hardware.

It should be 'a lower setup time'.
Sink sets 2h requesting 220us but source will only wait 165us.

Other than that looks good:
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>

> 
> I verified the value is present in eDP spec versions 1.3, 1.4 and
> 1.4a.
> 
> Fixes: 6608804b3d7f ("drm/dp: Add drm_dp_psr_setup_time()")
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 36c7609a4bd5..a7ba602a43a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -1159,6 +1159,7 @@ int drm_dp_psr_setup_time(const u8
> psr_cap[EDP_PSR_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
>       static const u16 psr_setup_time_us[] = {
>               PSR_SETUP_TIME(330),
>               PSR_SETUP_TIME(275),
> +             PSR_SETUP_TIME(220),
>               PSR_SETUP_TIME(165),
>               PSR_SETUP_TIME(110),
>               PSR_SETUP_TIME(55),
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to