On 04/05/2018 13:42, Chris Wilson wrote:
Ignore the tests looking at the innards of execlists and its submission tasklets on machines that don't support execlists!Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_lrc.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_lrc.c index ee7e22d18ff8..b7460b5dd4f7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_lrc.c @@ -505,5 +505,9 @@ int intel_execlists_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915) SUBTEST(live_preempt), SUBTEST(live_late_preempt), }; + + if (!HAS_EXECLISTS(i915)) + return 0; + return i915_subtests(tests, i915); }
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> Is it a mystery why it wasn't discovered when tests were added? Regards, Tvrtko _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
