On Wednesday 25 April 2018 06:26 AM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:


On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 17:14 +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 15:06 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
From: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagar...@intel.com>

Prints live state of psr1.Extending the existing
PSR2 live state function to cover psr1.

Tested on KBL with psr2 and psr1 panel.

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagar...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
----------
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h     |  1 +
  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index e0274f4..3056f04 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -2580,25 +2580,42 @@ static int i915_guc_log_relay_release(struct
inode *inode, struct file *file)
        .release = i915_guc_log_relay_release,
  };
-static const char *psr2_live_status(u32 val)
-{
-       static const char * const live_status[] = {
-               "IDLE",
-               "CAPTURE",
-               "CAPTURE_FS",
-               "SLEEP",
-               "BUFON_FW",
-               "ML_UP",
-               "SU_STANDBY",
-               "FAST_SLEEP",
-               "DEEP_SLEEP",
-               "BUF_ON",
-               "TG_ON"
-       };
-
-       val = (val & EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
-       if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
-               return live_status[val];
+static const char *psr_live_status(bool is_psr2_enabled, u32 val)
+{
+       if (is_psr2_enabled) {
+               static const char * const live_status[] = {
+                       "IDLE",
+                       "CAPTURE",
+                       "CAPTURE_FS",
+                       "SLEEP",
+                       "BUFON_FW",
+                       "ML_UP",
+                       "SU_STANDBY",
+                       "FAST_SLEEP",
+                       "DEEP_SLEEP",
+                       "BUF_ON",
+                       "TG_ON"
+               };
+               val = (val & EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
+                       EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
+               if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
+                       return live_status[val];
+       } else {
+               static const char * const live_status[] = {
+                       "IDLE",
+                       "SRDONACK",
+                       "SRDENT",
+                       "BUFOFF",
+                       "BUFON",
+                       "AUXACK",
+                       "SRDOFFACK",
+                       "SRDENT_ON",
+               };
+               val = (val & EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) >>
+                       EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT;
+               if (val < ARRAY_SIZE(live_status))
+                       return live_status[val];
+       }
return "unknown";
  }
@@ -2611,6 +2628,7 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file
*m, void *data)
        enum pipe pipe;
        bool enabled = false;
        bool sink_support;
+       u32 psr_status;
if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
                return -ENODEV;
@@ -2678,12 +2696,14 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct
seq_file *m, void *data)
seq_printf(m, "Performance_Counter: %u\n", psrperf);
        }
-       if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
-               u32 psr2 = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS);
- seq_printf(m, "EDP_PSR2_STATUS: %x [%s]\n",
-                          psr2, psr2_live_status(psr2));
-       }
+       psr_status = (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) ?
I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_STATUS) :
+                                                   I915_READ(EDP_PS
R_STATUS);
Maybe move the read of the PSR or PSR2 status to inside of
psr_live_status()
We are printing psr_status and it's live status[ additional debug information] , reading the psr_status here and only getting live status from psr_live_status function.

I am thinking we could reduce some clutter by changing both the status
functions to have this signature.


static void psr_source_status(dev_priv, m)
{

}

static void psr_sink_status(dev_priv, m)
{

}


Sure , we can change. Will send the v2 version.


Other than that looks good to me.

+       seq_printf(m, "EDP_PSR%s_STATUS: %x [%s]\n",
                        ^source_status or whatever the correct parallel to sink 
status that
Jose is using.


+                     dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled ? "2" : "1",
+                     psr_status,
+                     psr_live_status(dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled,
psr_status));
+
        mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index fb10602..c9598b4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -4058,6 +4058,7 @@ enum {
  #define   EDP_PSR_STATUS_SENDING_TP2_TP3      (1<<8)
  #define   EDP_PSR_STATUS_SENDING_TP1          (1<<4)
  #define   EDP_PSR_STATUS_IDLE_MASK            0xf
+#define   EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_SHIFT           29
#define EDP_PSR_PERF_CNT _MMIO(dev_priv-
psr_mmio_base + 0x44)
  #define   EDP_PSR_PERF_CNT_MASK               0xffffff

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to