On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:08:59 +0100
Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> If we have hit oom whilst holding our struct_mutex, then currently we
> cannot reap our own GPU buffers which likely pin most of memory, making
> an outright OOM more likely. So if we are running in direct reclaim and
> already hold the mutex, attempt to free buffers knowing that the
> original function can not continue until we return.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
I will try to review this a bit further on the plane ride home. It's
quite a scary patch, but it fixes OOM destroying IGT runs, so it's
pretty necessary IMO.
Meanwhile:
Tested-by: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 1d0cbfb..bed4084 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -4589,6 +4589,18 @@ void i915_gem_release(struct drm_device *dev, struct
> drm_file *file)
> spin_unlock(&file_priv->mm.lock);
> }
>
> +static bool mutex_is_locked_by(struct mutex *mutex, struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + if (!mutex_is_locked(mutex))
> + return false;
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES) || defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> + return mutex->owner == task;
> +#else
> + return false;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> static int
> i915_gem_inactive_shrink(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control
> *sc)
> {
> @@ -4599,10 +4611,15 @@ i915_gem_inactive_shrink(struct shrinker *shrinker,
> struct shrink_control *sc)
> struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> int nr_to_scan = sc->nr_to_scan;
> + bool unlock = true;
> int cnt;
>
> - if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->struct_mutex))
> - return 0;
> + if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->struct_mutex)) {
> + if (mutex_is_locked_by(&dev->struct_mutex, current))
> + unlock = false;
> + else
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> if (nr_to_scan) {
> nr_to_scan -= i915_gem_purge(dev_priv, nr_to_scan);
> @@ -4618,6 +4635,7 @@ i915_gem_inactive_shrink(struct shrinker *shrinker,
> struct shrink_control *sc)
> if (obj->pin_count == 0 && obj->pages_pin_count == 0)
> cnt += obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> + if (unlock)
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> return cnt;
> }
--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
