On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 16:25:33 +0000, Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > index 8f15616..5477454 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > @@ -2354,7 +2354,7 @@ static void gen6_disable_rps(struct drm_device *dev) > I915_WRITE(GEN6_RC_CONTROL, 0); > I915_WRITE(GEN6_RPNSWREQ, 1 << 31); > I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, 0xffffffff); > - I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIER, 0); > + I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIER, I915_READ(GEN6_PMIER) & ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS); > /* Complete PM interrupt masking here doesn't race with the rps work > * item again unmasking PM interrupts because that is using a different > * register (PMIMR) to mask PM interrupts. The only risk is in leaving > @@ -2364,7 +2364,7 @@ static void gen6_disable_rps(struct drm_device *dev) > dev_priv->rps.pm_iir = 0; > spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->rps.lock); > > - I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIIR, I915_READ(GEN6_PMIIR)); > + I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIIR, I915_READ(GEN6_PMIIR) & ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS); > } > > int intel_enable_rc6(const struct drm_device *dev) > @@ -2518,10 +2518,10 @@ static void gen6_enable_rps(struct drm_device *dev) > gen6_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, (gt_perf_status & 0xff00) >> 8); > > /* requires MSI enabled */ > - I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIER, GEN6_PM_DEFERRED_EVENTS); > + I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIER, I915_READ(GEN6_PMIER) | GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS); > spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->rps.lock); > WARN_ON(dev_priv->rps.pm_iir != 0); > - I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIMR, 0); > + I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIIR, I915_READ(GEN6_PMIIR) & GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS); > spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->rps.lock); > /* enable all PM interrupts */ > I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, 0);
Totally confused. IER = IER & ~RPS // only disable the RPS events IIR = IIR & RPS // clear the asserted RPS bits IMR != IIR. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
