Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-03-27 11:00:32) > Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-03-26 12:50:35) > > When cancelling the requests and clearing out the ports following a > > successful preemption completion, also clear the active flag. I had > > assumed that all preemptions would be followed by an immediate dequeue > > (preserving the active user flag), but under rare circumstances we may > > be triggering a preemption for the second port only for it to have > > completed before the preemotion kicks in; leaving execlists->active set > > even though the system is now idle. > > > > We can clear the flag inside the common execlists_cancel_port_requests() > > as the other users also expect the semantics of active being cleared. > > > > Fixes: f6322eddaff7 ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between > > submission ports") > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com> > > Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com> > > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > > From the earlier posting, > Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com> > > Mika, any chance you want to complete the hat check and review the first > patch as well? :)
s/hat check/hat trick/ -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx