On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:14:51PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> From: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com>
>
> v2: Use a switch for consistency (Chris Wilson)
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> index 87c8f1b..03307be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> @@ -466,6 +466,15 @@ intel_update_plane(struct drm_plane *plane, struct
> drm_crtc *crtc,
> if (intel_plane->pipe != intel_crtc->pipe)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* Sprite planes can be linear or x-tiled surfaces */
> + switch (obj->tiling_mode) {
> + case I915_TILING_NONE:
> + case I915_TILING_X:
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
I'm confused why this is necessary. intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj() already
has the check, so things should never go much further than this.
Futhermore someone can still go and change the tiling mode after this
point. Or indeed even at the same time as we're not holding
struct_mutex here (but this would be caught by
intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj()).
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
