On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:26:23AM -0700, jeff.mc...@intel.com wrote: > From: Jeff McGee <jeff.mc...@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff McGee <jeff.mc...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > index beb81f13a3cc..cec4e1653daf 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > @@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long > data) > * imposing the cost of a locked atomic transaction when submitting a > * new request (outside of the context-switch interrupt). > */ > - if (test_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted)) > + while (test_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted)) Assuming that this accidentally went missing in the refactor. Chris?
> process_csb(engine); > > if (!execlists_is_active(&engine->execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT)) > -- > 2.16.2 > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
