Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-02-15 07:37:13)
>> if (master_ctl & (GEN8_GT_RCS_IRQ | GEN8_GT_BCS_IRQ)) {
>> - gt_iir[0] = I915_READ_FW(GEN8_GT_IIR(0));
>> - if (gt_iir[0])
>> - I915_WRITE_FW(GEN8_GT_IIR(0), gt_iir[0]);
>> + gt_iir[0] = readl(regs +
>> i915_mmio_reg_offset(GEN8_GT_IIR(0)));
>> + if (likely(gt_iir[0]))
>> + writel(gt_iir[0], regs +
>> i915_mmio_reg_offset(GEN8_GT_IIR(0)));
>
> What do we feel about
>
> #define raw_reg_read32(mmio, reg) readl(mmio + i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg))
> #define raw_reg_write32(mmio, reg, value) writel(value, mmio +
> i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg))
I am in favour. Shorter versions would be even more pleasing.
reg_read and reg_write.
-Mika
>
> for transitioning away from the implicit argument in I915_READ?
> -Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
