On 2/14/2018 9:36 AM, abhijeet.ku...@intel.com wrote:
From: Abhijeet Kumar <abhijeet.ku...@intel.com> --- sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c index 8c1b07e300a8..377d5719b4cd 100644 --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.c @@ -2714,7 +2714,7 @@ static unsigned int hda_sync_power_state(struct hda_codec *codec, int count;for (count = 0;count < 500; count++) {- state = snd_hda_codec_read(codec, fg, 0, + state = snd_hdac_codec_read(&codec->core, fg, 0, AC_VERB_GET_POWER_STATE, 0); if (state & AC_PWRST_ERROR){ msleep(20);
Both tests are passing on hsw and bdw devices.I can conclude that none of my changes in "ALSA: hda: Make use of core codec functions to sync power state" is "*directly*" causing the regression. As this patch series changes the previously defined sync function similar to the latest one (the one defined
in the defaulter patch). Sidenote- Sorry for the missing commit message, it was just a HACK patch. :) -Abhijeet
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
