Assert that we do not try to unsubmit a completed request, as should we
try to resubmit it later, the ring is already past the request's
breadcrumb and the breadcrumb will not be updated.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
index 9b02310307fc..7192521e3d10 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
@@ -652,6 +652,8 @@ void __i915_gem_request_unsubmit(struct 
drm_i915_gem_request *request)
         */
        GEM_BUG_ON(!request->global_seqno);
        GEM_BUG_ON(request->global_seqno != engine->timeline->seqno);
+       GEM_BUG_ON(i915_seqno_passed(intel_engine_get_seqno(engine),
+                                    request->global_seqno));
        engine->timeline->seqno--;
 
        /* We may be recursing from the signal callback of another i915 fence */
-- 
2.15.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to