On 1/24/2018 3:20 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 10:49:02 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

Quoting Sagar Arun Kamble (2018-01-24 04:09:11)
Use consistent multi-line comment style as per guideline.

Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
index 27eb545..7c6c41b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@

 static void guc_log_capture_logs(struct intel_guc *guc);

-/**
+/*
  * DOC: GuC firmware log
  *
  * Firmware log is enabled by setting i915.guc_log_level to the positive level.

The double ** here indicates a kerneldoc. So this one is correct.

yes. will update.
The one that is wrong is in guc_log_runtime_destroy()
as it ends with **/

yes. that one got introduced by patch in series. will fix.
Michal

--
Thanks,
Sagar

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to