The test expected IOCTL 'I915_GET_RESET_STATS' would return an error
when not root. That is no longer true in the driver since commit
4c9c0d09741d ("drm/i915: Fix retrieval of hangcheck stats") and therefore
the test was incorrectly failing.

v2:
        - Add the commit that changed the behaviour in the Driver to the
          commit message. (Michel)

v3:
        - Reuse get_reset_count instead of implementing a new function.
          (Michel)

Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>
Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hi...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenzi...@intel.com>
---
 tests/gem_reset_stats.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/gem_reset_stats.c b/tests/gem_reset_stats.c
index edc40767..17a9b648 100644
--- a/tests/gem_reset_stats.c
+++ b/tests/gem_reset_stats.c
@@ -605,10 +605,7 @@ static void test_reset_count(const struct 
intel_execution_engine *e,
 
                c2 = get_reset_count(fd, ctx);
 
-               if (ctx == 0)
-                       igt_assert(c2 == -EPERM);
-               else
-                       igt_assert(c2 == 0);
+               igt_assert(c2 == 0);
        }
 
        igt_waitchildren();
@@ -644,10 +641,11 @@ static void _check_param_ctx(const int fd, const int ctx, 
const cap_t cap)
        const uint32_t bad = rand() + 1;
 
        if (ctx == 0) {
-               if (cap == root)
-                       igt_assert_eq(_test_params(fd, ctx, 0, 0), 0);
-               else
-                       igt_assert_eq(_test_params(fd, ctx, 0, 0), -EPERM);
+               igt_assert_eq(_test_params(fd, ctx, 0, 0), 0);
+
+               if (cap != root) {
+                       igt_assert(get_reset_count(fd, ctx) == 0);
+               }
        }
 
        igt_assert_eq(_test_params(fd, ctx, 0, bad), -EINVAL);
-- 
2.14.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to