On 01/10/2018 05:21 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:28:19PM +0000, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
The current size may be bigger than the correct one, this needs to be
revisited later.
I don't believe this is true anymore. When this was written initially CNL had a
higher value.
Higher values are ok, but smaller can be problematic if I understood correctly.
So we might need to check the accurate number.
Oscar has a good method for that if iirc ;)
My method says 14 pages. Seems a bit low, so I went ahead and tested it.
Everything seems to work fine, so I'll send a new patch.
v2: Rebase.
Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widaw...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
index e88b2fd44724..a373bcbd85d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -181,6 +181,8 @@ __intel_engine_context_size(struct drm_i915_private
*dev_priv, u8 class)
switch (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)) {
default:
MISSING_CASE(INTEL_GEN(dev_priv));
+ case 11:
+ /* TODO: Make sure this is correct. */
case 10:
return GEN10_LR_CONTEXT_RENDER_SIZE;
case 9:
--
2.14.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
