Some more findings I made while playing with this series & GPUTop.
Turns out the 2ms drift per second is due to timecounter. Adding the
delta this way :
https://github.com/djdeath/linux/commit/7b002cb360483e331053aec0f98433a5bd5c5c3f#diff-9b74bd0cfaa90b601d80713c7bd56be4R607
Eliminates the drift. Timelines of perf i915 tracepoints & OA reports
now make a lot more sense.
There is still the issue that reading the CPU clock & the RCS timestamp
is inherently not atomic. So there is a delta there.
I think we should add a new i915 perf record type to express the delta
that we measure this way :
https://github.com/djdeath/linux/commit/7b002cb360483e331053aec0f98433a5bd5c5c3f#diff-9b74bd0cfaa90b601d80713c7bd56be4R2475
So that userspace knows there might be a global offset between the 2
times and is able to present it.
Measurement on my KBL system were in the order of a few microseconds
(~30us).
I guess we might be able to setup the correlation point better (masking
interruption?) to reduce the delta.
Thanks,
-
Lionel
On 07/12/17 00:57, Robert Bragg wrote:
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Robert Bragg <rob...@sixbynine.org
<mailto:rob...@sixbynine.org>> wrote:
at least from what I wrote back then it looks like I was seeing a
drift of a few milliseconds per second on SKL. I vaguely recall it
being much worse given the frequency constants we had for Haswell.
Sorry I didn't actually re-read my own message properly before
referencing it :) Apparently the 2ms per second drift was for Haswell,
so presumably not quite so bad for SKL.
- Robert
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
