On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 12:34 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > Avoid having to test for spin[0] existing by starting the load-loop with > it allocated. > > v2: Preallocate the spin[1] as well for high load. > > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104060 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenb...@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/pm_rps: Always allocat... Chris Wilson
- [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for igt/pm_r... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for igt/pm_r... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for igt/pm_r... Patchwork
- Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for... Arkadiusz Hiler
- [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for igt/pm_r... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt v2] igt/pm_rps: Always... Chris Wilson
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt v2] igt/pm_rps... Szwichtenberg, Radoslaw
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt v2] igt/pm... Chris Wilson
- [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for igt/pm_r... Patchwork
- [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for igt/pm_r... Patchwork