On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Anything else we can do to move this? I just had to resolve a small
> > conflict when moving forward to -rc3. Carrying a revert for the entire
> > apic pull (too many deps to just revert the bisected patch) is a bit
> > annoying.
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1712081129450.1840@nanos
Another question. Is this broken on mainline or just with your new bits
targeted for next?
Thanks,
tglx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
