On Fri, 05 Oct 2012, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> round_jiffies() aligns the wakeup time to the nearest second in order to
> batch wakeups and reduce system load, which is useful for unimportant
> coarse timers like our hangcheck.
>
> Suggested-by: Arjan van de Ven <ar...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <ar...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |    1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |    3 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c |    5 ++---
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index d8043af..f79c664 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -460,6 +460,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private {
>  
>       /* For hangcheck timer */
>  #define DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD 1500 /* in ms */
> +#define DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_JIFFIES 
> msecs_to_jiffies(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD)
>       struct timer_list hangcheck_timer;
>       int hangcheck_count;
>       uint32_t last_acthd[I915_NUM_RINGS];
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index c78f8e3..8e05d53 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2151,8 +2151,7 @@ i915_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
>       if (!dev_priv->mm.suspended) {
>               if (i915_enable_hangcheck) {
>                       mod_timer(&dev_priv->hangcheck_timer,
> -                               jiffies +
> -                               msecs_to_jiffies(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD));
> +                               
> round_jiffies_relative(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_JIFFIES));

What is DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD based on; specifically is it a strict
minimum value? Should round_jiffies_*up*_relative() be used instead?

BR,
Jani.


>               }
>               if (was_empty) {
>                       queue_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index e18e56b..67dc487 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -353,8 +353,7 @@ static void notify_ring(struct drm_device *dev,
>       if (i915_enable_hangcheck) {
>               dev_priv->hangcheck_count = 0;
>               mod_timer(&dev_priv->hangcheck_timer,
> -                       jiffies +
> -                       msecs_to_jiffies(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD));
> +                       round_jiffies_relative(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_JIFFIES));
>       }
>  }
>  
> @@ -1787,7 +1786,7 @@ void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
>  repeat:
>       /* Reset timer case chip hangs without another request being added */
>       mod_timer(&dev_priv->hangcheck_timer,
> -               jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD));
> +               round_jiffies_relative(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_JIFFIES));
>  }
>  
>  /* drm_dma.h hooks
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to