In commit 69c2fc891343cb5217c866d10709343cff190bdc
Author: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Fri Jul 20 12:41:03 2012 +0100
drm/i915: Remove the per-ring write list
the explicit flush was removed from i915_ring_idle(). However, we
continued to wait upon the next seqno which now did not correspond to
any request (except for the unusual condition of a failure to queue a
request after execbuffer) and so would wait indefinitely.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
This time the complete patch, merging the forgotten partial commit.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 242f58b..39de523 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2593,10 +2593,29 @@ i915_gem_object_unbind(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
static int i915_ring_idle(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
{
- if (list_empty(&ring->active_list))
+ u32 seqno;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* We need to add any requests required to flush the objects */
+ if (!list_empty(&ring->active_list)) {
+ seqno = list_entry(ring->active_list.prev,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object,
+ ring_list)->last_read_seqno;
+
+ ret = i915_gem_check_olr(ring, seqno);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* Wait upon the last request to be completed */
+ if (list_empty(&ring->request_list))
return 0;
- return i915_wait_seqno(ring, i915_gem_next_request_seqno(ring));
+ seqno = list_entry(ring->request_list.prev,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_request,
+ list)->seqno;
+
+ return i915_wait_seqno(ring, seqno);
}
int i915_gpu_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
