Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com>

On 28/10/17 12:13, Chris Wilson wrote:
Wherever possible we want to use existing ioctls rather than poking the
volatile modparams, in this case we already provide
I915_PARAM_HAS_SEMAPHORES so we have no excuse to peek i915.semaphores.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
  lib/i915/gem_submission.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/i915/gem_submission.c b/lib/i915/gem_submission.c
index 2a57e7ab..882d4f41 100644
--- a/lib/i915/gem_submission.c
+++ b/lib/i915/gem_submission.c
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@
   */
#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+
+#include <i915_drm.h>
#include "igt_core.h"
  #include "igt_sysfs.h"
@@ -41,6 +44,18 @@
   * semaphores for synchronization between engines.
   */
+static bool has_semaphores(int fd, int dir)
+{
+       int val = 0;
+       struct drm_i915_getparam gp = {
+               gp.param = I915_PARAM_HAS_SEMAPHORES,
+               gp.value = &val,
+       };
+       if (ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GETPARAM, &gp) < 0)
+               val = igt_sysfs_get_boolean(dir, "semaphores");
+       return val;
+}
+
  /**
   * gem_submission_method:
   * @fd: open i915 drm file descriptor
@@ -69,7 +84,7 @@ unsigned gem_submission_method(int fd)
                goto out;
        }
- active = igt_sysfs_get_boolean(dir, "semaphores");
+       active = has_semaphores(fd, dir);
        if (active) {
                flags |= GEM_SUBMISSION_SEMAPHORES;
        }


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to