On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 08:03:47AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 25-10-17 om 01:01 schreef Matt Roper:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 05:13:40PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> The original intent was to preserve watermarks as much as possible
> >> in intel_pipe_wm.raw_wm, and put the validated ones in intel_pipe_wm.wm.
> >>
> >> It seems this approach is insufficient and we don't always preserve
> >> the raw watermarks, so just use the atomic iterator we're already using
> >> to get a const pointer to all bound planes on the crtc.
> >>
> >> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102373
> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
> >> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org #v4.8+
> > It's been a while since I looked at this code, so I'm not sure I'm
> > following all the context/history here.  Before this patch, we had
> > calculated watermarks for all levels (even those above the maximum
> > usable watermark level as determined by sprite usage) into raw_wm.  But
> > as far as I can tell, we never actually used those values for anything
> > so that was no different than just throwing the values away?
> 
> No, the trick introduced there was that we preserved the raw watermarks for 
> future
> calculations to not include all planes in a commit. This is now solved by 
> using the
> read-only drm_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state iterator, to get all
> const plane states without having to include them.
> 
> > Is my understanding correct that this is mostly a revert of 71f0a62614
> > ("drm/i915: Only use sanitized values for ILK watermarks) except that it
> > also modifies the level validation loop so that we're only calling
> > ilk_compute_wm_level() on the levels up to usable_level whereas before
> > that patch we were calling it on all levels, but then
> > setting wm->enable = false for the unusable levels?
> >
> > By my understanding, this looks like a safe simplification of the
> > current logic, but I don't see where the functional change is here.
> > Was the Buzilla: reference supposed to be tied to patch #2 of this
> > series or am I missing something important?
> 
> We now throw away all watermarks, and use 
> drm_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state
> to get the plane states. As a result we can throw away the raw watermarks, 
> which have
> proven to be insufficiently preserved. :)

Okay, makes more sense now.  Thanks for clarifying.

Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>


> 
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  1 -
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c  | 51 
> >> +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> >>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h 
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> >> index 47d022d48718..7bc60c848940 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> >> @@ -499,7 +499,6 @@ struct intel_crtc_scaler_state {
> >>  
> >>  struct intel_pipe_wm {
> >>    struct intel_wm_level wm[5];
> >> -  struct intel_wm_level raw_wm[5];
> >>    uint32_t linetime;
> >>    bool fbc_wm_enabled;
> >>    bool pipe_enabled;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c 
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >> index c42a65a93b3a..ea70c720f492 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >> @@ -2721,9 +2721,9 @@ static void ilk_compute_wm_level(const struct 
> >> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >>                             const struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> >>                             int level,
> >>                             struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> >> -                           struct intel_plane_state *pristate,
> >> -                           struct intel_plane_state *sprstate,
> >> -                           struct intel_plane_state *curstate,
> >> +                           const struct intel_plane_state *pristate,
> >> +                           const struct intel_plane_state *sprstate,
> >> +                           const struct intel_plane_state *curstate,
> >>                             struct intel_wm_level *result)
> >>  {
> >>    uint16_t pri_latency = dev_priv->wm.pri_latency[level];
> >> @@ -3043,28 +3043,24 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct 
> >> intel_crtc_state *cstate)
> >>    struct intel_pipe_wm *pipe_wm;
> >>    struct drm_device *dev = state->dev;
> >>    const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> >> -  struct intel_plane *intel_plane;
> >> -  struct intel_plane_state *pristate = NULL;
> >> -  struct intel_plane_state *sprstate = NULL;
> >> -  struct intel_plane_state *curstate = NULL;
> >> +  struct drm_plane *plane;
> >> +  const struct drm_plane_state *plane_state;
> >> +  const struct intel_plane_state *pristate = NULL;
> >> +  const struct intel_plane_state *sprstate = NULL;
> >> +  const struct intel_plane_state *curstate = NULL;
> >>    int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv), usable_level;
> >>    struct ilk_wm_maximums max;
> >>  
> >>    pipe_wm = &cstate->wm.ilk.optimal;
> >>  
> >> -  for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, intel_crtc, intel_plane) {
> >> -          struct intel_plane_state *ps;
> >> -
> >> -          ps = intel_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(state,
> >> -                                                     intel_plane);
> >> -          if (!ps)
> >> -                  continue;
> >> +  drm_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state(plane, plane_state, 
> >> &cstate->base) {
> >> +          const struct intel_plane_state *ps = 
> >> to_intel_plane_state(plane_state);
> >>  
> >> -          if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY)
> >> +          if (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY)
> >>                    pristate = ps;
> >> -          else if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY)
> >> +          else if (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY)
> >>                    sprstate = ps;
> >> -          else if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR)
> >> +          else if (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR)
> >>                    curstate = ps;
> >>    }
> >>  
> >> @@ -3086,11 +3082,9 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct 
> >> intel_crtc_state *cstate)
> >>    if (pipe_wm->sprites_scaled)
> >>            usable_level = 0;
> >>  
> >> -  ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, intel_crtc, 0, cstate,
> >> -                       pristate, sprstate, curstate, &pipe_wm->raw_wm[0]);
> >> -
> >>    memset(&pipe_wm->wm, 0, sizeof(pipe_wm->wm));
> >> -  pipe_wm->wm[0] = pipe_wm->raw_wm[0];
> >> +  ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, intel_crtc, 0, cstate,
> >> +                       pristate, sprstate, curstate, &pipe_wm->wm[0]);
> >>  
> >>    if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv))
> >>            pipe_wm->linetime = hsw_compute_linetime_wm(cstate);
> >> @@ -3100,8 +3094,8 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct 
> >> intel_crtc_state *cstate)
> >>  
> >>    ilk_compute_wm_reg_maximums(dev_priv, 1, &max);
> >>  
> >> -  for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
> >> -          struct intel_wm_level *wm = &pipe_wm->raw_wm[level];
> >> +  for (level = 1; level <= usable_level; level++) {
> >> +          struct intel_wm_level *wm = &pipe_wm->wm[level];
> >>  
> >>            ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, intel_crtc, level, cstate,
> >>                                 pristate, sprstate, curstate, wm);
> >> @@ -3111,13 +3105,10 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct 
> >> intel_crtc_state *cstate)
> >>             * register maximums since such watermarks are
> >>             * always invalid.
> >>             */
> >> -          if (level > usable_level)
> >> -                  continue;
> >> -
> >> -          if (ilk_validate_wm_level(level, &max, wm))
> >> -                  pipe_wm->wm[level] = *wm;
> >> -          else
> >> -                  usable_level = level;
> >> +          if (!ilk_validate_wm_level(level, &max, wm)) {
> >> +                  memset(wm, 0, sizeof(*wm));
> >> +                  break;
> >> +          }
> >>    }
> >>  
> >>    return 0;
> >> -- 
> >> 2.14.1
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Intel-gfx mailing list
> >> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to