We also want to support preemption with GuC submission backend.
In order to do that, we need to remember the priority, like we do on
execlists path.

v2: Remove completed prio == INT_MAX optimization

Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mc...@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
index 12f1c6a0afce..600ef9d33773 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
@@ -637,7 +637,6 @@ static void i915_guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
                        }
 
                        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->priotree.link);
-                       rq->priotree.priority = INT_MAX;
 
                        __i915_gem_request_submit(rq);
                        trace_i915_gem_request_in(rq, port_index(port, 
execlists));
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to