On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 21:13:11 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> This seems to be the symptom of a few neat bugs, hence be more
> obnoxious when this fails.
>
> Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index a716893..da45d39 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ void intel_wait_for_pipe_off(struct drm_device *dev,
> int pipe)
> /* Wait for the Pipe State to go off */
> if (wait_for((I915_READ(reg) & I965_PIPECONF_ACTIVE) == 0,
> 100))
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("pipe_off wait timed out\n");
> + WARN(1, "pipe_off wait timed out\n");
> } else {
> u32 last_line, line_mask;
> int reg = PIPEDSL(pipe);
> @@ -1024,7 +1024,7 @@ void intel_wait_for_pipe_off(struct drm_device *dev,
> int pipe)
> } while (((I915_READ(reg) & line_mask) != last_line) &&
> time_after(timeout, jiffies));
> if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("pipe_off wait timed out\n");
> + WARN(1, "pipe_off wait timed out\n");
> }
> }
>
I hope we can actually fix all the issues this will report... :)
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
