On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:55:08 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble
<sagar.a.kam...@intel.com> wrote:
From: "Kamble, Sagar A" <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
Disabling GuC interrupts involves access to GuC IRQ control registers
hence ensure device is RPM awake.
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
index ba36162..d7557b5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
@@ -657,8 +657,10 @@ void i915_guc_log_unregister(struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
return;
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
+ intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
/* GuC logging is currently the only user of Guc2Host interrupts */
gen9_disable_guc_interrupts(dev_priv);
+ intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
guc_log_runtime_destroy(&dev_priv->guc);
Maybe we should just destroy runtime here, and allow irq to be disabled
by intel_uc_fini_hw() which will be called right after. This will also
fix the upcoming case when log will not be the only user of Guc irqs.
See https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/170390/
Michal
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
}
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
