On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:36:09AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:00:39 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> 
> wrote:
> >  int
> > -i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> > -                         gfp_t gfpmask)
> > +i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> >  {
> > +   struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private;
> >     int page_count, i;
> >     struct address_space *mapping;
> > -   struct inode *inode;
> >     struct page *page;
> > +   gfp_t gfp;
> >  
> >     if (obj->pages || obj->sg_table)
> >             return 0;
> >  
> > +   /* Assert that the object is not currently in any GPU domain. As it
> > +    * wasn't in the GTT, there shouldn't be any way it could have been in
> > +    * a GPU cache
> > +    */
> > +   BUG_ON(obj->base.read_domains & I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS);
> > +   BUG_ON(obj->base.write_domain & I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS);
> > +
> >     /* Get the list of pages out of our struct file.  They'll be pinned
> >      * at this point until we release them.
> >      */
> >     page_count = obj->base.size / PAGE_SIZE;
> > -   BUG_ON(obj->pages != NULL);
> > -   obj->pages = drm_malloc_ab(page_count, sizeof(struct page *));
> > +   obj->pages = kmalloc(page_count*sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> This is a silly one (by me). At one point the patch introduced
> i915_malloc() and replaced drm_malloc_ab() with it and then I reverted
> that after transitioning to using the sg_table everywhere.
> 
> It needs to still be drm_malloc_ab() in this and the follow-on patches
> until it is replaced by sg_alloc_table().

Ok, history fixed. Can you please check whether I haven't fumbled it?

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to