On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:43:26PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com (2017-09-07 15:32:03)
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > drm_pci_alloc() refuses to cooperate if the passed alignment exceeds the
> > object size. So round up the obj size to the next power of two as well
> > to make this actually work.
> 
> 'Tis true.
> 
> > to begin with. However kms_cursor_crc doesn't always use power of two
> > sizes so we hit a failure when we try to allocate the phys memory.
> > 
> > Testcase: igt/kms_cursor_crc
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> 
> Shouldn't we remove the restriction from drm_pci.c? Seem like it is
> second guessing the actual dma allocator. We should just kill it
> entirely...

Perhaps. I was feeling lazy today though so left it at this.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to