On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:23:49PM +0530, Shashank Sharma wrote:
> It's an observation during some CI tests that few LSPCON chips
> respond slow while system is under load, and need some delay
> while reading current mode status using i2c-over-aux channel.
> 
> This patch:
> - Adds few retries and delays before declaring a read
>   failure from LSPCON hardware.
> - Changes the debug level of the print from ERROR->DEBUG
>   whereas another patch in I915 will add an ERROR message
>   from the caller when we have timed out all our limits.
> 
> V2: addressed review comments from Imre, and added r-b
>     - use int instead of u8 for counter
>     - use for loop instead of do...while();
> V3: Rebase
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sha...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.ku...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_dual_mode_helper.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_dual_mode_helper.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_dual_mode_helper.c
> index 80e62f6..fc8c7ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_dual_mode_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_dual_mode_helper.c
> @@ -409,6 +409,7 @@ int drm_lspcon_get_mode(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
>                       enum drm_lspcon_mode *mode)
>  {
>       u8 data;
> +     int retry;
>       int ret = 0;
>  
>       if (!mode) {
> @@ -417,10 +418,17 @@ int drm_lspcon_get_mode(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
>       }
>  
>       /* Read Status: i2c over aux */
> -     ret = drm_dp_dual_mode_read(adapter, DP_DUAL_MODE_LSPCON_CURRENT_MODE,
> -                                 &data, sizeof(data));
> +     for (retry = 5; ; retry--) {
> +             ret = drm_dp_dual_mode_read(adapter,
> +                                         DP_DUAL_MODE_LSPCON_CURRENT_MODE,
> +                                         &data, sizeof(data));

Why do we still need the retry here with patch 3/3?

> +             if (!ret || !retry)
> +                     break;
> +             usleep_range(500, 1000);
> +     }
> +
>       if (ret < 0) {
> -             DRM_ERROR("LSPCON read(0x80, 0x41) failed\n");
> +             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LSPCON read(0x80, 0x41) failed\n");
>               return -EFAULT;
>       }
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to