Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Daniel Stone <dani...@collabora.com> wrote:
> Due to a mix-up in kernel branches being used, I'd mangled Jason's > original CCS test to hopelessly overallocate the CCS surface size. > Restore it back to its original. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <dani...@collabora.com> > Cc: Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> > --- > tests/kms_ccs.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/kms_ccs.c b/tests/kms_ccs.c > index 0524a43e..a40d6c10 100644 > --- a/tests/kms_ccs.c > +++ b/tests/kms_ccs.c > @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static void display_fb(data_t *data, int compressed) > f.pitches[1] = ALIGN(width * 1, 128); > f.modifier[1] = modifier; > f.offsets[1] = size[0]; > - size[1] = f.pitches[1] * ALIGN(f.height, 32); > + size[1] = f.pitches[1] * ALIGN(height, 32); > > f.handles[0] = gem_create(data->drm_fd, size[0] + size[1]); > f.handles[1] = f.handles[0]; > -- > 2.13.4 > >
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
