On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 04:38:22PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> I wrote this code an year and a half ago and I couldn't exactly
> remember the main differences of these two structures when reviewing a
> new FBC patch. Add some comments to help explain what's the purpose of
> each struct.
> 
> For the record, the original commits are:
>  b183b3f14395 ("drm/i915/fbc: introduce struct intel_fbc_reg_params")
>  aaf78d276ba0 ("drm/i915/fbc: introduce struct intel_fbc_state_cache")
> 
> Cc: Praveen Paneri <praveen.pan...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>

Make them kerneldoc? It allows in-line comment, and maybe we'll have
proper kerneldoc for all our structs eventually. Either way

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index a1eeb489..271402c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1063,6 +1063,11 @@ struct intel_fbc {
>       bool underrun_detected;
>       struct work_struct underrun_work;
>  
> +     /*
> +      * Due to the atomic rules we can't access some structures without the
> +      * appropriate locking, so we cache information here in order to avoid
> +      * these problems.
> +      */
>       struct intel_fbc_state_cache {
>               struct i915_vma *vma;
>  
> @@ -1084,6 +1089,13 @@ struct intel_fbc {
>               } fb;
>       } state_cache;
>  
> +     /*
> +      * This structure contains everything that's relevant to program the
> +      * hardware registers. When we want to figure out if we need to disable
> +      * and re-enable FBC for a new configuration we just check if there's
> +      * something different in the struct. The genx_fbc_activate functions
> +      * are supposed to read from it in order to program the registers.
> +      */
>       struct intel_fbc_reg_params {
>               struct i915_vma *vma;
>  
> -- 
> 2.9.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to