> -----Original Message----- > From: intel-gvt-dev [mailto:intel-gvt-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On > Behalf Of Zhenyu Wang > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 5:49 PM > To: Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> > Cc: Tian, Kevin <kevin.t...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; > alex.william...@redhat.com; zhen...@linux.intel.com; chris@chris- > wilson.co.uk; kwankh...@nvidia.com; kra...@redhat.com; Zhang, Tina > <tina.zh...@intel.com>; intel-gvt-...@lists.freedesktop.org; Wang, Zhi A > <zhi.a.w...@intel.com>; Lv, Zhiyuan <zhiyuan...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/1] vfio: ABI for mdev display dma-buf operation > > On 2017.07.12 09:56:11 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 06:56:53AM +0000, Zhang, Tina wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Zhang, Tina > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 2:11 PM > > > > To: alex.william...@redhat.com; kra...@redhat.com; > > > > ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk; zhen...@linux.intel.com; Lv, Zhiyuan > > > > <zhiyuan...@intel.com>; Wang, Zhi A <zhi.a.w...@intel.com>; Tian, > > > > Kevin <kevin.t...@intel.com>; dan...@ffwll.ch; > > > > kwankh...@nvidia.com > > > > Cc: Zhang, Tina <tina.zh...@intel.com>; > > > > intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; intel- > > > > gvt-...@lists.freedesktop.org > > > > Subject: [PATCH v11 1/1] vfio: ABI for mdev display dma-buf > > > > operation > > > > > > > > Add VFIO_DEVICE_QUERY_GFX_PLANE ioctl command to let user mode > > > > query and get the plan and its related information. > > > > > > > > The dma-buf's life cycle is handled by user mode and tracked by kernel. > > > > The returned fd in struct vfio_device_query_gfx_plane can be a new > > > > fd or an old fd of a re-exported dma-buf. Host User mode can check > > > > the value of fd and to see if it needs to create new resource > > > > according to the new fd or just use the existed resource related to the > > > > old > fd. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tina Zhang <tina.zh...@intel.com> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > > > > index > > > > ae46105..c176cc8 100644 > > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > > > > @@ -502,6 +502,32 @@ struct vfio_pci_hot_reset { > > > > > > > > #define VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_HOT_RESET _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + > 13) > > > > > > > > +/** > > > > + * VFIO_DEVICE_QUERY_GFX_PLANE - _IOW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + > 14, > > > > struct > > > > +vfio_device_query_gfx_plane) > > > > + * > > > > + * Set the drm_plane_type and retrieve information about the gfx plane. > > > > + * > > > > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure. > > > > + */ > > > > +struct vfio_device_gfx_plane_info { > > > > + __u32 argsz; > > > > + __u32 flags; > > > > + /* in */ > > > > + __u32 drm_plane_type; /* type of plane: DRM_PLANE_TYPE_* */ > > > > + /* out */ > > > > + __u32 drm_format; /* drm format of plane */ > > > > + __u32 width; /* width of plane */ > > > > + __u32 height; /* height of plane */ > > > > + __u32 stride; /* stride of plane */ > > > > + __u32 size; /* size of plane in bytes, align on page*/ > > > > + __u32 x_pos; /* horizontal position of cursor plane, upper > > > > left corner > > > > in pixels */ > > > > + __u32 y_pos; /* vertical position of cursor plane, upper > > > > left corner in > > > > lines*/ > > > > + __s32 fd; /* dma-buf fd */ > > > > +}; > > > > + > > > I remove plane_id as I cannot find its meaning for dmabuf usage. Also, I > don't know how it could be used by region usage. > > > So, if someone can explain its usage, I can add it back. Thanks. > > > > > > Another open is, so far, our design is focused on dmabuf based gfx > > > plane only. Can we go a step further to consider a general Buffer > > > sharing interface? If we reference V4L2, we can see dmabuf can be > > > considered as one kind of buffers, we can have more kinds of > > > buffers, like mmap buffer and so on. So, if we think about that, we may > need another ioctl to ask the mdev device which kind of buffer it supports, > and > then use the VFIO_DEVICE_QUERY_* ioctl to get it back for user mode accessing. > Different kinds of mdev devices can have different query ioctl name and > structure. Is it reasonable? > > > > This is what dma-buf are for. v4l2 also supports dma-buf, and dma-buf > > support mmap. I think dma-buf will give you everything you want. > > > > yep, I think Tina's point is to how to provide that dmabuf interface properly, > either in this case for vgpu display specifically or any benefit to provide a > generic > buffer expose/share interface for vfio/mdev. But even for vgpu display > interface, > e.g gvt driver would go with dmabuf but nv driver will go with region based, > then I don't think we could easily have a generic enough design for every mdev > type or driver. So I believe we should stick with and hopefully get aligned > for this > interface now. Thanks, Zhenyu. I'm just wondering to know if it is reasonable to support a general buffer expose/share interface for vfio/mdev device. After all, what we do here is to provide a way to expose/share the mdev buffer to host Apps, (not sure whether different mdev devices would also be interested in this), e.g. Qemu. Is it possible that we define a genera way to support different kinds of buffers? For example, could region be a kind of buffer existing with dma-buf type of buffer. Is there any other flavor of buffer we want to support, if we take some reference for V4L2 to buffer support Enum v4l2_memory { V4L2_MEMORY_MMAP V4L2_MEMORY_USERPTR V4L2_MEMORY_OVERLAY V4L2_MEMORY_DMABUF } Thanks.
Tina > > -- > Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. > > $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
