On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:13:38AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Use the new iterator macro and look for crtc_state->active instead of
> enable, only crtc_state->enable implies that vblanks will happen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkei...@ti.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
> index 022029ea6972..66d3c6bfd6a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
> @@ -57,13 +57,13 @@ static void omap_fb_output_poll_changed(struct drm_device 
> *dev)
>  static void omap_atomic_wait_for_completion(struct drm_device *dev,
>                                           struct drm_atomic_state *old_state)
>  {
> -     struct drm_crtc_state *old_crtc_state;
> +     struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
>       struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>       unsigned int i;
>       int ret;
>  
> -     for_each_crtc_in_state(old_state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i) {
> -             if (!crtc->state->enable)
> +     for_each_new_crtc_in_state(old_state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
> +             if (!new_crtc_state->active)
>                       continue;
>  
>               ret = omap_crtc_wait_pending(crtc);
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to