On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 12:42:32PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 12:25:08 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > wrote: > > The intention is to help select which engine to use for copies with > > interoperating clients - such as a GL client making a request to the X > > server to perform a SwapBuffers, which may require copying from the > > active GL back buffer to the X front buffer. > > We choose to report a mask of the active rings to future proof the > interface against any changes which may allow for the object to reside > upon multiple rings.
Queued for -next with the bikeshed applied as discussed on irc, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
