On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:27:40AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2017, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com> wrote:
> > Validate the compliance test link parameters when the compliance
> > test dpcd registers are read. Also validate them in compute_config
> > before using them since the max values might have been reduced
> > due to link training fallback.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > index 832786d..cda0f0a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -1678,12 +1678,15 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder 
> > *encoder,
> >     if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
> >             int index;
> >  
> > -           index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> > -                                       intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> > -                                       
> > intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
> > -           if (index >= 0)
> > +           /* Validate the compliance test data */
> > +           if (intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, 
> > intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate,
> > +                                          
> > intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count)) {
> > +                   index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> > +                                               intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> > +                                               
> > intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
> 
> I think you still need to check index >= 0. intel_dp_link_params_valid
> only checks the boundaries, not that the common rates actually contains
> the value.
>

I thought that it would be implied that if it falls within the bounds then
it would be part of the common_rates array. But yes no harm in checking the 
index >=0 here
again. 

I will add this check.

Manasi

 
> >                     min_clock = max_clock = index;
> > -           min_lane_count = max_lane_count = 
> > intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
> > +                   min_lane_count = max_lane_count = 
> > intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
> > +           }
> >     }
> >     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i "
> >                   "max bw %d pixel clock %iKHz\n",
> > @@ -3961,8 +3964,7 @@ intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, 
> > u8 *sink_irq_vector)
> >  static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  {
> >     int status = 0;
> > -   int min_lane_count = 1;
> > -   int link_rate_index, test_link_rate;
> > +   int test_link_rate;
> >     uint8_t test_lane_count, test_link_bw;
> >     /* (DP CTS 1.2)
> >      * 4.3.1.11
> > @@ -3976,10 +3978,6 @@ static uint8_t 
> > intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >             return DP_TEST_NAK;
> >     }
> >     test_lane_count &= DP_MAX_LANE_COUNT_MASK;
> > -   /* Validate the requested lane count */
> > -   if (test_lane_count < min_lane_count ||
> > -       test_lane_count > intel_dp->max_link_lane_count)
> > -           return DP_TEST_NAK;
> >  
> >     status = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_LINK_RATE,
> >                                &test_link_bw);
> > @@ -3987,12 +3985,11 @@ static uint8_t 
> > intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Rate read failed\n");
> >             return DP_TEST_NAK;
> >     }
> > -   /* Validate the requested link rate */
> >     test_link_rate = drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(test_link_bw);
> > -   link_rate_index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> > -                                         intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> > -                                         test_link_rate);
> > -   if (link_rate_index < 0)
> > +
> > +   /* Validate the requested link rate and lane count */
> > +   if (!intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, test_link_rate,
> > +                                   test_lane_count))
> >             return DP_TEST_NAK;
> 
> The changes here LGTM.
> 
> >  
> >     intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count = test_lane_count;
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to