Hopefully this makes userspace slightly less confused about us
frobbing the dpms state behind its back. Yeah, it would be better
to be more careful with not changing the dpms state, but that is
quite more invasive.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index c8f7f54..91d8560 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -6910,8 +6910,15 @@ bool intel_crtc_set_mode(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
 
                intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(connector->encoder->crtc);
 
-               if (prepare_pipes & (1 << intel_crtc->pipe))
+               if (prepare_pipes & (1 << intel_crtc->pipe)) {
+                       struct drm_property *dpms_property =
+                               dev->mode_config.dpms_property;
+
                        connector->dpms = DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON;
+                       drm_connector_property_set_value(connector,
+                                                        dpms_property,
+                                                        DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON);
+               }
 
                to_intel_encoder(connector->encoder)->connectors_active = true;
 
-- 
1.7.7.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to