Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> As the handler is now quite complex, involving a few atomics, the cost
> of the function preamble is negligible in comparison and so we should
> leave the function out-of-line for better I$.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 86ede88daaab..8f60c8045b3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@ static void snb_gt_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> ivybridge_parity_error_irq_handler(dev_priv, gt_iir);
> }
>
> -static __always_inline void
> +static void
> gen8_cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 iir, int test_shift)
> {
> bool tasklet = false;
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
