On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 00:54 +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> Sorry for the wait. This is not a complete review, just some quick
> comments for now.
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 16:48 -0700, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote:
> > Currently the intel_dp_aux_backlight driver requires eDP panel
> > to not also support backlight adjustment via PWM pin to use
> > this driver.
> > 
> > This force the eDP panel that support both ways of backlight
> > adjustment to do it via PWM pin.
> > 
> > This patch adds the new prefer DPCD mode in the i915_param
> > to make it enable to prefer DPCD over the PWM via kernel param.
> > 
> > This patch also add a check to DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_AUX_ENABLE_CAP
> > in set_aux_backlight_enable() since the backlight enablement
> > can be done via BL_ENABLE eDP connector pin in the case that
> > it does not support doing that via AUX.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Puthikorn Voravootivat <put...@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c            |  6 ++---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h            |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 33 
> > +++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > index b6a7e363d076..960393dd5edf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct i915_params i915 __read_mostly = {
> >     .huc_firmware_path = NULL,
> >     .enable_dp_mst = true,
> >     .inject_load_failure = 0,
> > -   .enable_dpcd_backlight = false,
> > +   .enable_dpcd_backlight = 0,
> >     .enable_gvt = false,
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -246,9 +246,9 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable_dp_mst,
> >  module_param_named_unsafe(inject_load_failure, i915.inject_load_failure, 
> > uint, 0400);
> >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(inject_load_failure,
> >     "Force an error after a number of failure check points (0:disabled 
> > (default), N:force failure at the Nth failure check point)");
> > -module_param_named(enable_dpcd_backlight, i915.enable_dpcd_backlight, 
> > bool, 0600);
> > +module_param_named(enable_dpcd_backlight, i915.enable_dpcd_backlight, int, 
> > 0600);
> >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable_dpcd_backlight,
> > -   "Enable support for DPCD backlight control (default:false)");
> > +   "Enable support for DPCD backlight control (0:disable (default), 
> > 1:prefer PWM pin, 2: prefer DPCD)");
> 
> I looked at other int parameters, -1=default, 0=disable(prefer PWM in
> your case), 1=enable(prefer DPCD) seems like the more common way to do
> this.
> 
> 
> >  
> >  module_param_named(enable_gvt, i915.enable_gvt, bool, 0400);
> >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable_gvt,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> > index 34148cc8637c..bf6e2c60f697 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
> >     func(int, use_mmio_flip); \
> >     func(int, mmio_debug); \
> >     func(int, edp_vswing); \
> > +   func(int, enable_dpcd_backlight); \
> >     func(unsigned int, inject_load_failure); \
> >     /* leave bools at the end to not create holes */ \
> >     func(bool, alpha_support); \
> > @@ -66,7 +67,6 @@
> >     func(bool, verbose_state_checks); \
> >     func(bool, nuclear_pageflip); \
> >     func(bool, enable_dp_mst); \
> > -   func(bool, enable_dpcd_backlight); \
> >     func(bool, enable_gvt)
> >  
> >  #define MEMBER(T, member) T member
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> > index 6532e226db29..42f73d9a3ccf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> > @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ static void set_aux_backlight_enable(struct intel_dp 
> > *intel_dp, bool enable)
> >  {
> >     uint8_t reg_val = 0;
> >  
> > +   /* Early return when display use other mechanism to enable backlight. */
> > +   if (!(intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_AUX_ENABLE_CAP))
> > +           return;
> > +
> >     if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_EDP_DISPLAY_CONTROL_REGISTER,
> >                           &reg_val) < 0) {
> >             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to read DPCD register 0x%x\n",
> > @@ -138,27 +142,36 @@ static bool
> >  intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
> >  {
> >     struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(&connector->encoder->base);
> > +   bool supported;
> >  
> >     /* Check the  eDP Display control capabilities registers to determine if
> >      * the panel can support backlight control over the aux channel
> >      */
> > -   if (intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_TCON_BACKLIGHT_ADJUSTMENT_CAP &&
> > -       (intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_AUX_ENABLE_CAP) &&
> > -       !((intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_PIN_ENABLE_CAP) ||
> > -         (intel_dp->edp_dpcd[2] & 
> > DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_BRIGHTNESS_PWM_PIN_CAP))) {
> > -           DRM_DEBUG_KMS("AUX Backlight Control Supported!\n");
> > -           return true;
> > +   switch (i915.enable_dpcd_backlight) {
> > +   case 1: /* prefer PWM pin */
> > +           supported = (intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & 
> > DP_EDP_TCON_BACKLIGHT_ADJUSTMENT_CAP) &&
> > +                       (intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & 
> > DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_AUX_ENABLE_CAP) &&
> > +                       !(intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & 
> > DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_PIN_ENABLE_CAP) &&
> > +                       !(intel_dp->edp_dpcd[2] & 
> > DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_BRIGHTNESS_PWM_PIN_CAP);
> > +           break;
> > +   case 2: /* prefer DPCD */
> > +           supported = (intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & 
> > DP_EDP_TCON_BACKLIGHT_ADJUSTMENT_CAP) &&
> > +                       (intel_dp->edp_dpcd[2] & 
> > DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_BRIGHTNESS_AUX_SET_CAP);
> > +           break;
> > +   default:
> > +           supported = false;
> >     }
> > -   return false;
> > +
> > +   if (supported)
> > +           DRM_DEBUG_KMS("AUX Backlight Control Supported!\n");
> > +
> > +   return supported;
> 
> 
> If i915.enable_dpcd_backlight = 0, aren't you returning an uninitialized
> variable here?
> 
> -DK
> 

Ignore that, time for coffee. 

 
> 
> >  }
> >  
> >  int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector 
> > *intel_connector)
> >  {
> >     struct intel_panel *panel = &intel_connector->panel;
> >  
> > -   if (!i915.enable_dpcd_backlight)
> > -           return -ENODEV;
> > -
> >     if (!intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
> >             return -ENODEV;
> >  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to