On Friday, April 28, 2017 11:33:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, April 28, 2017 05:16:02 PM Imre Deak wrote: > > Some drivers - like i915 - may not support the system suspend direct > > complete optimization due to differences in their runtime and system > > suspend sequence. Add a flag that when set resumes the device before > > calling the driver's system suspend handlers which effectively disables > > the optimization. > > > > Needed by the next patch fixing suspend/resume on i915. > > > > Suggested by Rafael. > > > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com> > > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > The reason why the opt-out flag was not added on day one was because we were > not sure whether or not it would be necessary at all. > > Quite evidently, it is needed.
But that said, it actually can be implemented as a flag in dev_flags too, say PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NEEDS_RESUME, in analogy with PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_D3 that's already there. The struct size would not need to grow then which I guess would be better? Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
