Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes: > If we poison the request before we emit commands, it should be easier to > spot when we execute an uninitialised request. > > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100144 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index 8c874996c617..1ec98851a621 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -1693,6 +1693,7 @@ u32 *intel_ring_begin(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, > int num_dwords) > > GEM_BUG_ON(ring->emit > ring->size - bytes); > cs = ring->vaddr + ring->emit; > + GEM_DEBUG_EXEC(memset(cs, POISON_INUSE, bytes));
Will more modern hardware just skipover these? If so then perhaps more advanced solution would be to fill with bb start into the previous address to get a guaranteed hang on the spot. Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com> > ring->emit += bytes; > ring->space -= bytes; > GEM_BUG_ON(ring->space < 0); > -- > 2.11.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
