On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 12:15:02PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> As for BXT, PP_DIVISOR was removed from CNP PCH and power
> cycle delay has been moved to PP_CONTROL.
> 
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index b38cba7..da111cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ static void intel_pps_get_registers(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>       regs->pp_stat = PP_STATUS(pps_idx);
>       regs->pp_on = PP_ON_DELAYS(pps_idx);
>       regs->pp_off = PP_OFF_DELAYS(pps_idx);
> -     if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> +     if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) && !HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv))

GEN >= 10 all over might be more future proof.

>               regs->pp_div = PP_DIVISOR(pps_idx);
>  }
>  
> @@ -5198,7 +5198,7 @@ static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct 
> intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>       pp_on = I915_READ(regs.pp_on);
>       pp_off = I915_READ(regs.pp_off);
> -     if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> +     if (!IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) && !HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) {
>               I915_WRITE(regs.pp_ctrl, pp_ctl);

Slightly unrelated, but I wonder what this write is doing in the BXT+
branch. I'm thinking it should either be done unconditionally, or we
should just nuke it since I think Imre's early pps unlock thing should
have already done it if needed, I think.

>               pp_div = I915_READ(regs.pp_div);
>       }
> @@ -5216,7 +5216,7 @@ static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct 
> intel_dp *intel_dp)
>       seq->t10 = (pp_off & PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_MASK) >>
>                  PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT;
>  
> -     if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> +     if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) {
>               u16 tmp = (pp_ctl & BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) >>
>                       BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT;
>               if (tmp > 0)
> @@ -5373,7 +5373,7 @@ static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct 
> intel_dp *intel_dp)
>                (seq->t10 << PANEL_POWER_DOWN_DELAY_SHIFT);
>       /* Compute the divisor for the pp clock, simply match the Bspec
>        * formula. */
> -     if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
> +     if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) {
>               pp_div = I915_READ(regs.pp_ctrl);
>               pp_div &= ~BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK;
>               pp_div |= (DIV_ROUND_UP((seq->t11_t12 + 1), 1000)
> @@ -5407,7 +5407,7 @@ static void intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps(struct 
> intel_dp *intel_dp)
>       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("panel power sequencer register settings: PP_ON %#x, 
> PP_OFF %#x, PP_DIV %#x\n",
>                     I915_READ(regs.pp_on),
>                     I915_READ(regs.pp_off),
> -                   IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) ?
> +                   (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CNP(dev_priv)) ?
>                     (I915_READ(regs.pp_ctrl) & BXT_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK) :
>                     I915_READ(regs.pp_div));
>  }
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to