On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:49:35PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > By using the same structure for both interruptible and > uninterruptible locking in shrinker code, combined with the > information that mm.interruptible is only being written to, the > code can be greatly simplified. > > Also removing the i915_gem_ prefix from the locking functions so > that nobody in their wildest dreams considers exporting them. > > Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
I still feel uneasy that I'm not using mm.uninterruptible in some parts of modesetting, nevertheless the change is correct, simplies the current code and means I have to fix gen2 properly if anyone ever notices. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
