The commit message looks good now.

Reviewed-by: <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com>

Manasi

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:23:10PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> In link training fallback, we're trying to find a rate that we know is
> in a sorted array of common link rates. We don't need to limit the array
> using the max rate. For test request, the DP CTS doesn't say we should
> limit the rate based on earlier fallback. This lets us get rid of
> intel_dp_link_rate_index() and use intel_dp_rate_index() instead.
> 
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> updated commit message, no changes
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 31 ++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 1808af6d635d..8c061c54d481 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -317,25 +317,16 @@ static int intel_dp_common_len_rate_limit(struct 
> intel_dp *intel_dp,
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int intel_dp_link_rate_index(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int link_rate)
> -{
> -     int common_len;
> -
> -     common_len = intel_dp_common_len_rate_limit(intel_dp,
> -                                                 
> intel_dp->max_sink_link_rate);
> -
> -     return intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates, common_len, 
> link_rate);
> -}
> -
>  int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>                                           int link_rate, uint8_t lane_count)
>  {
> -     const int *common_rates = intel_dp->common_rates;
> -     int link_rate_index;
> +     int index;
>  
> -     link_rate_index = intel_dp_link_rate_index(intel_dp, link_rate);
> -     if (link_rate_index > 0) {
> -             intel_dp->max_sink_link_rate = common_rates[link_rate_index - 
> 1];
> +     index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> +                                 intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> +                                 link_rate);
> +     if (index > 0) {
> +             intel_dp->max_sink_link_rate = intel_dp->common_rates[index - 
> 1];
>               intel_dp->max_sink_lane_count = lane_count;
>       } else if (lane_count > 1) {
>               intel_dp->max_sink_link_rate = intel_dp_max_sink_rate(intel_dp);
> @@ -1685,8 +1676,9 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  
>       /* Use values requested by Compliance Test Request */
>       if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
> -             link_rate_index = intel_dp_link_rate_index(intel_dp,
> -                                                        
> intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
> +             link_rate_index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> +                                                   
> intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> +                                                   
> intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
>               if (link_rate_index >= 0)
>                       min_clock = max_clock = link_rate_index;
>               min_lane_count = max_lane_count = 
> intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
> @@ -3988,8 +3980,9 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_link_training(struct 
> intel_dp *intel_dp)
>       }
>       /* Validate the requested link rate */
>       test_link_rate = drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(test_link_bw);
> -     link_rate_index = intel_dp_link_rate_index(intel_dp,
> -                                                test_link_rate);
> +     link_rate_index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> +                                           intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> +                                           test_link_rate);
>       if (link_rate_index < 0)
>               return DP_TEST_NAK;
>  
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to